Wednesday, February 23, 2011

How Much Does Stacy London Get Paid

Poll of the week (32)

Great players of all time: What is your opinion of artificial intelligence in chess?


"In the eighteenth century began to spread the idea of \u200b\u200bcreating a computer able to play chess. In 1769, a chess player automaton called The Turk became famous before it was discovered it was a hoax. The English Leonardo Torres y Quevedo built in 1912, a robot capable of playing chess, called The Chess Player. After those events, the subject of mechanical chess is not mentioned again and fell into oblivion, until the advent of the computer in the early 50's. Since then, chess enthusiasts and computer engineering and software have built machines that play chess.

Turk

Today, chess computers are available for a small price, and there are many programs (many free software like GNU Chess, Amy, or Crafty) that can play chess on any personal computer and beat professional players under tournament conditions , while some of the best commercial chess programs like Shredder, Fritz, Rybka or Fruit, many players have beaten gauge and several world champions in a very short control times and blitz. "http:// es.wikipedia.org / wiki / Ajedrez_por_computadora


"'Houdini': free monster" . For Leontxo Garcia 02/23/1911:

"Amid tremendous controversy over allegations of plagiarism, Houdini, one of the new free programs that encourage and challenge the future of professional programmers, destroyed in a duel 40 matches (23.5 to 16.5) to nearly invincible Rybka. In this awesome game, winner-triple concept exhibits a pawn sacrifice by the development-unheard of in a machine ":

Rybka 4.0. vs. Houdini 1.5a., Duel TCEC, 28/01/1911.

Rybka 4.0. vs. Houdini 1.5a., Posición tras 16...Cd3!

“Chip que parece humano” . Por Leontxo García 8.12.10:

“Hicieron falta 50 años para que una máquina entendiera conceptos de ajedrez que un niño puede comprender en un minuto (por ejemplo, que una dama encerrada no vale nueve puntos mientras esté así; o la fuerza de un peón pasado a largo plazo). A partir Deep Blue was able to program something like intuition on a computer, and gave an inhuman chess pawn for attack in the medium term. But this is even more impressive and beautiful "

vs Jonny. Rybka, XXX Open Computers. Leiden, 27/11/1910

"Sacrifices inhuman" . For Leontxo Garcia 04/06/1910:


"Simultaneously with his victory in a major tournament Dutch computer, the programmer of Rybka, Vasik Rajlich, has launched its new version. Judging by the experts at the game, you Rybka 4 improves his predecessors in evaluating positions in general and especially the safety of the king. In addition, estimates faster and play better endings. And the reader will delight now the single most surprising, a few years ago no one expected that programs could make beautiful long-term sacrifices, such as the play 23 ":

Stockfish vs 1.7.1. Rybka 4, Beta Testing. Rio de Janeiro, 24/05/1910.

"Hosts risk" . For Leontxo Garcia 05/19/2009:


"There are several programs that look like humans, because they sense and understand the concept of risk. It is a breakthrough that has been in the World (..). Pamplona Hiarcs, able to envision several moves beyond the limit of computing power, is one of them, as seen in this beautiful, impressive and memorable batch "

vs Hiarcs. Jonny, Computer World, Pamplona, \u200b\u200b16/05/1909.

'Jewel' inhuman 'in Pamplona ". For Leontxo Garcia 14/05/2009:

"This is one of the best games of chess silicon since the inception of the first more than half a century. Most impressive is his human style, with medium-term sacrifices in exchange of abstract concepts such as "heavy attack" on a machine theoretically impossible "

vs Junior. Hiarcs, Computer World, Pamplona, \u200b\u200b05/12/2009.

First World Championship in Stockholm 1974 computer

Kasparov vs. Deep Blue

Kasparov vs. Deep Blue in 1997

"In May 1997, an improved version of Deep Blue defeated Kasparov in a match of 6 items by 3.5-2.5 causing a big debate about whether the stronger player at the time was a machine.
subsequently said that IBM had cheated by using a human player in the game to increase the strategic strength of the computer. In 2003 a documentary about the confrontation, entitled Game Over: Kasparov and the Machine. "(Wikipedia)

" The bombing of Deep Blue ". For Leontxo Garcia 11/05/2007:

"Deep Blue beat Kasparov's last game of his second duel, and IBM shares surged the following day on Wall Street. Actually, the defeat of world champion, by 2 ,5-3, 5, was due to a rookie mistake and his obsession because, supposedly, we were cheating. But the game has great historical value "

vs. Deep Blue. Kasparov, New York 1997 match, 6 and decisive game http://www.elpais.com/misc/ajedrez/11mayo.htm
VIDEO

documentary "Game Over: Kasparov and the Machine":




0 comments:

Post a Comment